Harmony Tan vs Cadence Brace Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In evaluating second serve performance over the past six months, Brace has secured 36.71% of points when executing their second serve. On the other hand, Tan has achieved a marginally better success rate, winning 41.93% of their second serve points. This particular statistic frequently aligns with the accuracy of match predictions.

When it comes to returning serve, the figures indicate that Brace has won 45.31% of their opponent's second serve points recently. Tan surpasses this with a success rate of 48.06% in the same category. For first serve returns, Brace achieved 33.36% while Tan recorded 26.74%, which is a critical determinant in favoring one player in this head-to-head comparison.

Analyzing match performance for the past year, Brace boasts a win percentage of 62.9% with a win-loss record of 39-23, while Tan holds a 57.63% win rate, accompanied by 34 wins against 25 losses. Brace predominantly competes in Challengers/ITF tournaments worth over $10K, maintaining a 62.9% win rate, whereas Tan participates effectively in similar events, achieving a 60.78% win rate.

Under pressure, Brace exhibits resilience, successfully saving 45.93% of breakpoints, compared to Tan's 40.35% in recent performance. This ability to handle crucial moments is important for in-game wagering predictions. Conversely, Brace converts 39.33% of their break point opportunities, outdoing Tan's conversion rate of 32.2%.

Tan excels on grass surfaces, registering a career win rate of 68%, while their least favorable surface is clay, where they win 51% of matches. In contrast, Brace thrives on hard courts with a 60% success rate, but their performance dips on indoor hard courts to 54%.

Considering the quality of opponents faced over the last year, Tan's adversaries possess an average rank of 369.07, whereas Brace's opponents have an average rank of 478.97. In deciding set scenarios, Tan proves more proficient, winning 62% of such sets, while Brace has managed to clinch 43%.

Based on these comparative statistics and current forms, Tan emerges as the more favorable candidate to secure victory in the impending match. The lower opponent rank and superior deciding set record considerably bolster Tan’s chances of success.